Article was co-written by Roman Civin, Laszlo Varga and Yulia Akhulkova.
Methodology
Based on data Nimdzi has collected around the translation management systems (TMS) market over the past decade, we have compiled the first public version of our TMS Compass. We have supplemented the data with the cumulative knowledge and experience of our experts who work with a variety of TMS products on a daily basis.
Application
The Nimdzi Compass can be used to help developers and businesses assess the potential of TMS software. For example, a developer of a new language software product could use the compass to see where their product would fit within the market. A business that is considering adopting a TMS could use this matrix to learn how mature and innovative the technology is.
Dimensions and Labels
The TMS market features over 130 different solutions. When selecting the TMS providers to evaluate for the compass, we chose well-known and established products with which our team also has extensive hands-on experience.
As we've been tracking TMS providers, we picked the top-13 providers looking at their time on the market as well as their ability to innovate.
Dimensions
Time on the market is depicted horizontally, indicating how long the provider has been servicing the market.
The vertical aspect reflects how innovative the product is. Does the TMS keep ahead of the curve or does it rather react to demand? Does it leverage new foundational paradigms such as AI and LLMs? Does it have progressive features like MTQE, etc? TMS ranked in the bottom half may get the job done, but if you’re expecting a tool to give you that extra boost, search in the top half.
Labels
Phoenixes: Long-time players who have continually been able to reinvent their product.
Survivors: The oldest players on the market.
Trusted bets: Those who have been proving their ability to innovate for over a decade on average.
Traditionalists: Well-established TMS brands characterized by the reactiveness of their developments.
New visionaries: Younger, yet quite disruptive companies.
New conformists: Newer additions to the market who follow traditional TMS behaviors.
Disclaimer: Scoring is somewhat subjective, and so are the cut-offs
In evaluating the innovation capability of TMS, we asked a range of experts to rate them on a scale of one to five, and averaged the scores. While this scoring mechanism is not completely objective, it provided us with a useful means of clustering. The separators between clusters were placed with simple sophistication to highlight key insights. However, these separators are not set in stone, and borderline cases could in fact go either way within a margin of uncertainty.
Ask the experts
The aspects that are most important for a particular TMS buyer vary depending on the actual application. Talk to a Nimdzi expert to identify the specific needs of a TMS application in your organization. By carefully selecting the variables for our partners, Nimdzi creates custom assessments that result in a valuable tool for understanding the potential of the required language software.
References
History of TMS
TMS Feature Explorer
Translation Management Systems
TMS Mosaic report (2019)
TMS Arena (2020)
The Nimdzi Language Technology Series: TMS (2021)
ROI of a TMS (2021)
TMS Migration Challenges
Exclusive SDL Language Cloud first impressions
NMT & TMS: How Do They Work Together
文章由罗曼·西文、拉兹洛·沃尔高和尤利娅·阿胡尔科娃共同撰写。
方法论
基于Nimdzi在过去十年中围绕翻译管理系统(TMS)市场收集的数据,我们编制了TMS指南针的第一个公共版本。我们用每天使用各种TMS产品的专家积累的知识和经验补充了数据。
应用
Nimdzi指南针可用于帮助开发人员和企业评估TMS软件的潜力。例如,一个新语言软件产品的开发者可以使用指南针来查看他们的产品在市场中的位置。正在考虑采用TMS的企业可以使用这个矩阵来了解该技术有多成熟和创新。
尺寸和标签
TMS市场有130多种不同的解决方案。在选择TMS提供商对指南针进行评估时,我们选择了我们团队拥有丰富实践经验的知名成熟产品。
由于我们一直在跟踪TMS提供商,我们根据他们在市场上的时间以及他们的创新能力选出了前13名提供商。
尺寸
市场上的时间是水平描绘的,表示提供商已经为市场服务了多长时间。
垂直方面反映了产品的创新性。TMS是保持领先还是对需求做出反应?它是否利用了人工智能和LLMs等新的基础范式?它有像MTQE等进步的功能吗?排在下半部分的TMS可能会完成工作,但是如果你期待一个工具给你额外的提升,那就在上半部分搜索。
标签
凤凰:能够不断改造产品的长期玩家。
幸存者:市场上最老的玩家。
可信的赌注:那些平均十多年来一直证明自己创新能力的人。
传统主义者:以其发展的反应性为特征的成熟的TMS品牌。
新的远见者:更年轻,但相当具有颠覆性的公司。
新的墨守成规者:遵循传统TMS行为的市场新成员。
免责声明:评分有点主观,所以是截断
在评估TMS的创新能力时,我们请了一系列专家按1到5的等级对其进行评级,并对分数进行平均。虽然这种评分机制并不完全客观,但它为我们提供了一种有用的聚类方法。集群之间的分隔符放置简单复杂,以突出关键见解。然而,这些分离器并不是一成不变的,事实上,在不确定的范围内,边缘案件可能会向任何一个方向发展。
请教专家
对于特定的TMS购买者来说,最重要的方面因实际应用而异。与Nimdzi专家交流,确定您组织中TMS应用程序的具体需求。通过为我们的合作伙伴精心选择变量,Nimdzi创建了定制评估,为了解所需语言软件的潜力提供了一个有价值的工具。
参考文献
TMS历史
TMS功能资源管理器
翻译管理系统
TMS Mosaic报告(2019)
TMS Arena(2020)
Nimdzi语言技术系列:TMS(2021)
TMS的投资回报率(2021)
TMS迁移挑战
独家SDL语言云第一印象
NMT和TMS:它们是如何协同工作的
以上中文文本为机器翻译,存在不同程度偏差和错误,请理解并参考英文原文阅读。
阅读原文