NCQAs Distinction in Multicultural Healthcare in 2021: Impact and Benefits of Accreditation

2021年NCQAs在多元文化卫生保健中的区别:认证的影响和好处

2021-01-29 06:25 United Language Group

本文共934个字,阅读需10分钟

阅读模式 切换至中文

Patients from linguistically and culturally diverse backgrounds experience health disparities and differential health outcomes compared to the overall population. By 2050, nearly one in five people living in the U.S. will be foreign born. Now, more than ever, it is time to reaffirm our commitment to reducing health disparities for patients of all linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Achieving distinction in multicultural healthcare is a comprehensive strategy to improve an organization’s response to the health care needs of minority members and those with limited English proficiency (LEP). The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Multicultural Healthcare (MHC) accreditation is broadly accepted as the seal of approval in healthcare. Because the evaluation process is performed by an external organization, accreditation status delivers an impartial opinion about the healthcare organization’s standard of quality. Why Pursue Accreditation? National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Multicultural Healthcare accreditation not only recognizes and lends credibility to organizations; it also helps them accomplish the following objectives: Identifying gaps in care (data, policy and practice) Establishing standardization Equitably serving all customers and communities Building a plan to address disparities Identifying opportunities for improved and enhanced patient experience Over the last decade, the NCQA distinction scoring system has influenced the way healthcare organizations prepare for MHC accreditation. In 2020 alone, however, we’ve seen the United States and the rest of the globe reinvigorate a social justice movement as a global pandemic put a major spotlight on health disparities and inequality. With the focus on quality of care, this cultural transition means keeping up with MHC requirements is more important than ever. As you take steps to correct inequities, you will begin to see Improved outcomes Decreased costs Higher ratings from your members Earning the Distinction NCQA publicly reports quality results, ensuring a fair and consistent comparison among all applicants. In order to become accredited, organizations must demonstrate the following: Collection of race, ethnicity, and language data Identification and action on opportunities for improving culturally and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) Provision of language services Reduction of healthcare disparities MHC Standards NCQA scores equally on clinical performance, consumer experience, and a set of standards used to measure performance. Key things to keep in mind include Organizations must attempt to collect race and ethnicity data directly from members. Collected race and ethnicity data must be reported using the Office of Management and Budget (OMG) categories. Organizations must have a documented process for how it estimates race/ethnicity using indirect methods, e.g., geo coding and surname analysis. Organizations must maintain an electronic database that can receive, store, and retrieve race and ethnicity information at the individual member level. Organizations must report the HEDIS Race/Ethnicity Diversity of Membership Measures For more in-depth education for the MHC Standards watch our webinar The Role of Language Studies and data collected for some time shows there are indeed disparities in healthcare, and members with limited English proficiency (LEP) suffer the consequences. Research indicates that emergency department (ED) patients with LEP are 24% more likely to have an unplanned ED revisit within 72 hours. Additionally, hospital stays are 50% longer for individuals with LEP than those of English-speaking patients with similar conditions. Plus healthcare costs -- including pharmacy costs -- are twice as much for those with limited English proficiency. Requirements for NCQA MHC accreditation directly play a role in closing the gap in health equity. Accredited organizations must Collect language data directly from members using the Institute of Medicine (IOM) method or another method Maintain an electronic database that can relieve, store, and retrieve information on language needs at the individual member level Every three years, use state or community-level data to determine the languages spoken in their service areas, both for translation purposes and to anticipate and plan for changes in language services provided Report up to 15 “threshold languages”—those spoken by 1% of the population or 200 eligible individuals, whichever is less Report the HEDIS Race/Ethnicity Diversity of Membership measure To be successful, organizations should Share data with practitioners about the language needs of individual members and populations Provide language assistance resources to practitioners Make training available to practitioners Distribute a written notice in English and the threshold languages that free language services are available, including information on how to access them. Evolution of the Process As mentioned above, growing awareness of widespread health disparities during the Covid-19 pandemic has led healthcare organizations to strengthen their existing health equity efforts and initiatives. This is, however, a complex and ever-changing process. Some of the criteria that have changed in recent years include The look-back period for renewal surveys prior to July 1, 2021 is 12 months and 24 months after July 1, 2022. (The current look-back period is six months.) Updated scope of review sections address evidence required for initial surveys and renewal surveys. Organizations are expected to monitor and assess their program annually through data and information captured via staff and member/patient experience. Every three years, they must analyze and enhance network responsiveness by Analyzing their network’s capacity to meet the language needs of members Analyzing the cultural responsiveness of their networks Developing plans and implementing steps to address network gaps in the availability of languages and/or cultural responsiveness Guidance for Language Services, MHC accreditation and Beyond If all the requirements have your team scrambling, ULG can help. From a new accreditation, renewal, or training, our experts are ready to guide your team through the entire accreditation process. For more information about meeting the language needs of diverse populations, check out our blog! hbspt.cta._relativeUrls=true;hbspt.cta.load(3356907, '5fc0c96b-2193-4e6d-b710-16c0775e18bc', {});
来自不同语言和文化背景的患者与整体人口相比,在健康方面存在差异和不同的健康结果。到2050年,近五分之一的美国人将在国外出生。现在比以往任何时候都更应该重申我们致力于减少各种语言和文化背景患者的健康差距。 在多元文化卫生保健方面实现卓越是一项综合战略,旨在改善组织对少数群体成员和英语水平有限者的卫生保健需求的反应。国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)多元文化卫生保健(MHC)认证被广泛接受为卫生保健认证的印章。因为评估过程是由外部组织执行的,认证状态提供了关于医疗保健组织质量标准的公正意见。 为什么要追求认证? 国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)多元文化卫生保健认证不仅承认并赋予组织信誉;它还帮助他们实现以下目标: 查明护理方面的差距(数据,政策和做法) 建立标准化 公平地为所有客户和社区服务 制定解决差距的计划 确定改善和增强患者体验的机会 在过去的十年中,NCQA区分评分系统已经影响了医疗保健组织准备MHC认证的方式。然而,仅在2020年,我们就看到美国和世界其他地区重新掀起了一场社会正义运动,因为一场全球性的大流行病使人们对健康差距和不平等问题产生了极大的关注。随着对护理质量的关注,这种文化转变意味着跟上MHC的要求比以往任何时候都更加重要。当你采取措施纠正不平等时,你将开始看到 改进成果 费用减少 来自您的成员的更高评级 赢得荣誉 NCQA公开报告高质量的结果,确保在所有申请人之间进行公平和一致的比较。为了获得认证,组织必须证明以下几点: 收集种族,族裔和语言数据 查明改进文化和语言上适当的服务的机会并采取行动(CLAS) 提供语文服务 减少保健差距 MHC标准 NCQA在临床表现,消费者体验,以及一组用来衡量表现的标准上评分相等。要记住的关键事项包括 各组织必须尝试直接从成员处收集种族和族裔数据。 收集的种族和族裔数据必须使用管理和预算办公室(OMG)分类报告。 各组织必须有一个文件化的流程,说明如何使用间接方法(如地理编码和姓氏分析)估计种族/族裔。 组织必须维护一个电子数据库,该数据库可以接收,存储和检索个人成员级别的种族和族裔信息。 各组织必须报告HEDIS成员的种族/族裔多样性衡量标准 有关MHC标准的更深入的教育,请观看我们的网络研讨会 语言的作用 一段时间以来收集的研究和数据显示,在医疗保健方面确实存在着差距,而英语水平有限的成员(LEP)则承受着这一后果。研究表明,急诊科(ED)的LEP患者72小时内有24%的可能会有计划外的ED再访。此外,LEP患者的住院时间比同样情况的讲英语的患者长50%。加上医疗费用--包括药费--对于那些英语水平有限的人来说是两倍。对NCQA和MHC认证的要求直接起到了弥合健康公平差距的作用。经认可的组织必须 使用医学研究所(IOM)方法或其他方法直接从成员处收集语言数据 维持一个电子数据库,以减轻,储存和检索关于个别成员一级语文需要的信息 每三年使用州或社区一级的数据来确定其服务领域所说的语言,既用于翻译目的,也用于预测和规划所提供的语言服务的变化 最多报告15种“门槛语言”----1%的人口或200名合格个人所说的语言,以较少者为准 报告HEDIS种族/族裔成员多样性衡量标准 要取得成功,各组织应 与从业人员分享关于个人成员和人口语言需求的数据 为从业人员提供语言辅助资源 向从业人员提供培训 分发一份书面通知,以英文和最低语言说明可提供免费语言服务,包括如何获得这些服务的信息。 进程的演变 如上所述,在Covid-19大流行期间,人们日益认识到广泛的健康差异,这促使卫生保健组织加强其现有的健康公平努力和倡议。然而,这是一个复杂和不断变化的过程。近年来发生变化的一些标准包括 2021年7月1日前续期调查的回头看期为12个月,2022年7月1日后为24个月。(目前的回顾期为六个月。) 经更新的审查范围章节涉及初次调查和续展调查所需的证据。 组织应每年通过从员工和成员/患者经验中获取的数据和信息来监控和评估他们的项目。每三年,他们必须通过以下方法分析和提高网络响应能力 分析其网络满足成员语言需求的能力 分析其网络的文化响应性 制定计划和采取步骤,解决网络在语言和(或)文化响应能力方面的差距 语言服务指南,MHC认证及其他 如果所有的需求都让您的团队手忙脚乱,ULG可以提供帮助。从一个新的认证,续签,或培训,我们的专家准备引导您的团队通过整个认证过程。想了解更多关于满足不同人群语言需求的信息,请查看我们的博客! hbspt.cta._relativeURLS=true;hbspt.cta.load(3356907,'5FC0C96B-2193-4E6D-B710-16C0775E18BC',{});

以上中文文本为机器翻译,存在不同程度偏差和错误,请理解并参考英文原文阅读。

阅读原文