How to Tackle COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation

如何处理COVID-19疫苗错误信息

2021-03-25 06:00 United Language Group

本文共1062个字,阅读需11分钟

阅读模式 切换至中文

As states like Alaska, Mississippi, and Arizona begin opening up appointments for all individuals 16 and older, it seems like “normal” may return sometime in the near future. Yet, for as many people who are anxiously refreshing health portals or scouring clinic sites, there are just as many saying, “The vaccine is too new. I’m not going to get it.” In February 2020, the World Health Organization coined the term “infodemic.” It refers to “an excessive amount of information about a problem, which makes it difficult to identify a solution.” This is what many Americans are feeling at the moment. When information and news claw their way into their lives from every direction, it can be difficult to find an accurate and unbiased source. The internet is no longer just a place for finding and sharing important information – it is also a place for misinformation. What is misinformation? Since COVID-19 began, information has been widely and sometimes incorrectly spread. It has created distrust in public health authorities, and it is now creating misinformation and distrust about the COVID-19 vaccine. Misinformation occurs when source information is distorted due to misunderstanding, fear, and subsequent miscommunication. The idea of “source information” is key in understanding how misinformation has impacted all communities during the pandemic. Source information can sometimes be poorly translated into a different language and culminate in key concepts being misinterpreted, taken out of context, or lost altogether. When this happens, the original message of the source information is gone. What one person read in one language is different than what another person read in another. COVID-specific terminology has perpetuated this issue because not every language has equivalent vocabulary or translations. This can make it even more difficult to ensure that everyone has the same information. Overall, misinformation is a common issue among the LEP (Limited English Proficiency) communities as they may be consuming and sharing content that is improperly translated. Even a small translation error can escalate and eventually take on a new meaning. Furthermore, when coupled with people’s valid concerns, religious, political, and cultural beliefs, or prejudices, information can create a real dilemma for individuals on the fence about getting vaccinated. Does misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine matter? The short answer is yes. While you may say, “Why does this matter? Anyone who wants the vaccine should get it, and anyone who doesn’t want it shouldn’t,” it simply doesn’t (or at least, shouldn’t) work like that. The ideal solution would be that everyone could opt-in or out based on whatever they’re feeling. Unfortunately, the misperception and hesitancy about the vaccine could ultimately prolong the pandemic and make it difficult to achieve herd immunity. Herd immunity, also known as population immunity, is indirect protection from an infectious disease. This occurs when the population is either immune through vaccination or from prior infection. The World Health Organization supports achieving herd immunity through vaccination ---- not by simply letting the disease spread until everyone has had it. This would not only have disastrous effects on our healthcare system but would also result in unnecessary cases and deaths. So in short, the faster everyone gets vaccinated, the faster society achieves herd immunity, and the faster your life returns to pre-pandemic “normal.” How can you tackle misinformation? Do you remember the game “telephone” that you used to play as a child? The one where you’d stand in a line and the first person would whisper something to the second person. The second person would whisper whatever they heard to the third person, and so on until you reached the end of the line. Often, because you were only whispering whatever you heard. Misinformation is like that…but working backward. To address it, you must begin by identifying the source. This could be a trusted friend or family member, social media, or the news. You may have noticed that Facebook and Instagram are working to dispel misinformation by linking any posts that are COVID-19-related directly to the CDC website. All of this comes down to the fact that the people disseminating information aren’t trusted messengers. In many cases, they may be well-meaning, but that doesn’t mean they’re well-informed. To stop misinformation, especially to vulnerable communities, you can take the following actions. 1. Report and de-platform misinformation You’ve probably seen “COVID-19 Vaccine Myths” either on Facebook or Instagram. While the purpose of these posts is to highlight incorrect information, they still often share misinformation and give it a platform it wouldn’t otherwise have. Choose instead to only share correct information, and report misinformation when you see it. You may also engage with others when you’ve identified misinformation and actively respond with credible information. Over time, continuous exposure to correct statistics, data, and evidence can help to reduce and eliminate concerns stemming from misinformation. Keep at it! While vaccination will ultimately benefit everyone through herd immunity, it’s still valid to have concerns and want to learn more. Thus, it’s essential to engage with and validate the concerns, especially those of communities of color, LEP communities, and vulnerable groups. It’s not a clear delineation of pro-vaccination versus anti-vaxxers. It’s a more nuanced spectrum where people bring their experiences to the table, and these aren’t always pleasant experiences. This article details the history of medical testing that experts say contributed to the systematic distrust of the medical system for Black Americans. The community’s negative experiences are carrying over into whether they’ll opt to receive the vaccine when it’s available to them. This survey by the Public Policy Institute of California received the following response when they asked different groups whether they would “definitely” or “probably” get a COVID-19 vaccine. Asian – 70% White – 60% Latino – 54% Black – 29% This distrust of the medical system is also clear in statistics like those of the Kaiser Family Foundation. They found that 43% of Black Americans wanted to “wait and see” before receiving the vaccine compared to 26% of White Americans. The CDC data reflects much of the same. As of March 15, 2021, the CDC reported that race/ethnicity was known for just over half (53%) of people who had received at least one dose of the vaccine. Among this group, 66 percent were White, 9% were Hispanic, 8% were Black, 5% were Asian, 2% were American Indian or Alaska Native, and <1% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. Additionally, 11% reported multiple or other race. Furthermore, White people have a higher vaccination rate compared to both Black (19% v. 11%) and Hispanic individuals (19% v. 9%). Overall, the statistics reflect the uncertainty in these communities. Take time to answer questions with empathy and remember why they’re unsure. The historical context of their mistrust sheds light on why additional support on this topic is necessary. 3. Use trusted groups and influencers who work at the grass-roots level This Reuters study notes the types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Perhaps unsurprisingly, top-down information from politicians, celebrities, and other prominent public figures made up just 20 percent of all claims in their sample but accounted for 69% percent of total social media engagement. While these prominent figures aren’t necessarily spreading the most information, they are receiving the most engagement and thus have the most influence. To counter this, credible public health institutions can partner with prominent community figures, groups, and influencers (such as civil rights organizations) to share accurate information. Groups that are experienced at working at the grass-roots levels will find it easier to dispel harmful rumors about the vaccine and understand the importance of validating community concerns. 4. Make information digestible across various language and cultures Heavy use of scientific terminology and medical jargon has made information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine inaccessible to LEP communities. To maximize inclusivity, information must be created in a linguistically accessible and digestible way. The Center for Black Health & Equity’s Better For It campaign is one example of a program seeking to make information more accessible linguistically while addressing the cultural nuances often lost in COVID-19 messaging. Cultural messaging – in addition to linguistic – is essential in addressing concerns that certain groups may have with the vaccine. For example, a collectivist culture (ex: Venezuela, Guatemala, Ecuador) may feel better about receiving the vaccine if they understand it as an opportunity to protect their loved ones. Their culture values family and community above all else. Similarly, undocumented individuals may be more likely to receive the vaccine if they understand that they do not need to share information, have insurance, or pay money to receive it. The federal government has ensured that insurance coverage and immigration status are not eligibility requirements, and it must be made clear that receiving the vaccine will not put them in harm’s way. Finally, the Cherokee Nation prioritized first-language Cherokee speakers in their vaccine roll-out back in December. Promoting cultural preservation was a key decision-making factor in this situation for these individuals. Ultimately, information made accessible to individuals in their own language and from their own cultural perspective will be more effective. By tapping into relevant cultural values and concerns, you’re able to build trust and connections which furthers the fight against COVID-19. Final thoughts At United Language Group, we strive to assist LEP patients from start to finish. Equal access to healthcare should be available to everyone – including LEP patients – and this includes the COVID-19 vaccine. Our Vaccine Equity Program includes five touchpoints to build trust and provide equity, which ultimately ensures a positive patient experience. Visit here to learn more about how our 5-step approach helps all eligible individuals receive the vaccine regardless of language or cultural barriers.
随着像阿拉斯加,密西西比州和亚利桑那州这样的州开始为所有16岁以上的人开放约会,似乎“正常”可能会在不久的将来回归。 但是,对于急于刷新健康门户网站或搜寻诊所站点的许多人来说,有很多人在说:“疫苗太新了。 我不会得到它。” 2020年2月,世界卫生组织(WHO)创造了“信息流行病”一词。 它指的是“关于问题的过多信息,这使得难以确定解决方案。” 这就是许多美国人目前的感受。 当信息和新闻从各个方向进入他们的生活时,可能很难找到准确无偏的信息来源。 互联网不再只是查找和共享重要信息的地方,而是错误信息的地方。 什么是错误信息? 自从COVID-19开始以来,信息已经广泛传播,有时传播不正确。 它已引起公众对卫生部门的不信任,并且现在正在引起对COVID-19疫苗的误解和不信任。 当源信息由于误解,恐惧和随后的错误传达而失真时,就会发生错误信息。 “源信息”的概念是理解大流行期间错误信息如何影响所有社区的关键。 有时,源信息可能无法很好地翻译成另一种语言,最终导致关键概念被误解,脱离上下文或完全丢失。 发生这种情况时,源信息的原始消息就消失了。 一个人用一种语言阅读的内容不同于另一种人用另一种语言阅读的内容。 特定于COVID的术语使该问题永久存在,因为并非每种语言都有相同的词汇或翻译。 这会使确保每个人都拥有相同的信息变得更加困难。 总体而言,错误信息是LEP(英语水平有限)社区中的一个常见问题,因为他们可能会消耗和共享翻译不当的内容。 即使是很小的翻译错误也可能升级,并最终呈现出新的含义。 此外,信息与人们的正当关注,宗教,政治和文化信仰或偏见结合在一起时,可能会给围栏上的个人带来真正的两难选择:接种疫苗。 关于COVID-19疫苗的错误信息是否重要? 简短的答案是肯定的。 您可能会说:“为什么这很重要? 任何想要该疫苗的人都应该得到它,而任何不想要它的人都应该得到它,”它根本不(或者至少不应该)那样工作。 理想的解决方案是每个人都可以根据自己的感受选择加入或退出。 不幸的是,对疫苗的误解和犹豫最终可能会延长大流行,并使其难以获得畜群免疫力。 畜群免疫力,也称为群体免疫力,是对传染病的间接保护。 当人群通过疫苗接种或以前的感染获得免疫时,就会发生这种情况。 世界卫生组织支持通过疫苗接种来实现畜群免疫,而不是简单地让这种疾病传播到所有人都得了。 这不仅会对我们的医疗系统造成灾难性影响,还会导致不必要的情况和死亡。 简而言之,每个人接种疫苗的速度越快,社会获得畜群免疫的速度就越快,您的生活恢复大流行前“正常”的速度就越快。 您如何处理错误信息? 您还记得您小时候玩过的“电话”游戏吗? 一个人站成一排,第一人称会对第二人说悄悄话。 第二个人会对第三个人低声说些什么,依此类推,直到您到达该行的末尾为止。 通常,因为您只是在窃窃私语。 错误的信息就是那样……但是却倒退了。 要解决这个问题,您必须先确定来源。 这可能是受信任的朋友或家人,社交媒体或新闻。 您可能已经注意到,Facebook和Instagram通过将与COVID-19相关的任何帖子直接链接到CDC网站来消除错误信息。 所有这些归结为一个事实,即传播信息的人不是可信赖的使者。 在许多情况下,它们可能是善意的,但这并不意味着它们是知情的。 要制止错误信息,尤其是针对弱势群体的错误信息,您可以采取以下措施。 1.报告和消除平台错误信息 您可能已经在Facebook或Instagram上看到“ COVID-19疫苗神话”。 这些帖子的目的是突出显示不正确的信息,但它们仍然经常共享错误信息,并为其提供一个其他平台无法提供的平台。 而是选择仅共享正确的信息,并在看到错误信息时报告错误信息。 当您发现错误信息并以可靠的信息积极回应时,也可以与他人互动。 随着时间的流逝,不断接触正确的统计数据,数据和证据可以帮助减少和消除错误信息引起的担忧。 继续吧! 虽然疫苗接种最终将通过牛群免疫使所有人受益,但仍然存在顾虑并想了解更多信息仍然有效。 因此,至关重要的是要参与并验证关注点,尤其是有色人种,LEP社区和弱势群体的关注点。 尚不清楚疫苗接种前和抗疫苗接种后的情况。 人们将自己的经验带到餐桌上的情况更加细微,但这些体验并不总是那么令人愉快。 本文详细介绍了医学测试的历史,专家们说这是导致黑人美国人对医学系统的系统性不信任的原因。 社区的负面经验正在影响着他们是否会在有疫苗时选择接受疫苗。 加利福尼亚州公共政策研究所的这项调查在询问不同的人群是否“肯定”或“可能”获得COVID-19疫苗时收到以下答复。 亚洲-70% 白人-60% 拉丁裔-54% 黑人-29% 对医疗系统的这种不信任在Kaiser家庭基金会的统计数据中也很明显。 他们发现,有43%的黑人美国人希望在接受疫苗之前“拭目以待”,而26%的白人美国人。 CDC的数据反映了大部分相同的情况。截至2021年3月15日,CDC报告称,在至少接种过一剂疫苗的人群中,仅有超过一半(53%)的人知道种族/族裔。在这一群体中,66%为白人,9%为西班牙裔,8%为黑人,5%为亚裔,2%为美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加本地人,<1%为夏威夷本地人或其他太平洋岛民。此外,11%报告了多种族或其他种族。此外,与黑人(19%对11%)和西班牙裔(19%对9%)相比,白人的疫苗接种率更高。 总体而言,统计数字反映了这些社区的不确定性。花点时间用同理心回答问题,记住他们为什么不确定。他们互不信任的历史背景说明了为什么在这个问题上需要更多的支持。 3.利用在基层工作的受信任的团体和有影响力的人 这项路透社的研究指出了COVID-19错误信息的类型,来源和声明。也许并不奇怪,来自政客,名人和其他知名公众人物的自上而下的信息只占他们样本中所有信息的20%,但却占到了社交媒体总参与度的69%。 虽然这些显赫人物并不一定传播最多的信息,但他们却获得了最多的参与,因此也就拥有了最大的影响力。为了应对这一问题,可信的公共卫生机构可以与社区知名人士,团体和有影响者(如民权组织)合作,分享准确的信息。 在基层工作经验丰富的团体会发现更容易消除有关疫苗的有害谣言,并了解确认社区关切的重要性。 4.使信息能够被不同语言和文化所消化 大量使用科学术语和医学术语使得LEP社区无法获得有关COVID-19疫苗的信息。为了最大限度地扩大包容性,必须以语言上可获取和易于消化的方式创建信息。 黑人健康与公平中心的“Better for It”运动就是一个例子,该项目寻求使信息在语言上更容易获得,同时解决在COVID-19信息传递中经常丢失的文化细微差别。除了语言信息外,文化信息对于解决某些群体可能对疫苗产生的关切至关重要。 例如,集体主义文化(例如:委内瑞拉,危地马拉,厄瓜多尔)如果将接种疫苗理解为保护他们所爱的人的一个机会,他们可能会对接种疫苗感到更好。他们的文化把家庭和社区看得高于一切。 同样,无证件的个人可能更有可能接受疫苗,如果他们明白他们不需要分享信息,没有保险,或支付金钱来接受疫苗。联邦政府已经确保保险范围和移民身份不是资格要求,而且必须明确接种疫苗不会让他们处于危险的境地。 最后,切罗基族在12月份的疫苗推广中优先考虑说第一语言的切罗基人。在这种情况下,对这些人来说,促进文化保护是一个关键的决策因素。 最终,以个人语言和文化视角向个人提供的信息将更加有效。 通过利用相关的文化价值观和关注点,您可以建立信任和联系,从而进一步打击COVID-19。 最后的想法 在United Language Group,我们努力从始至终为LEP患者提供帮助。 每个人(包括LEP患者)都应享有平等的医疗保健机会,其中包括COVID-19疫苗。 我们的疫苗公平计划包括五个接触点,以建立信任和提供公平,最终确保积极的患者体验。 请访问此处,以了解有关我们的5步方法如何帮助所有符合条件的个人接种疫苗的信息,无论其语言或文化障碍如何。

以上中文文本为机器翻译,存在不同程度偏差和错误,请理解并参考英文原文阅读。

阅读原文